Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Unverified Commit 275ef417 authored by Colin O'Dell's avatar Colin O'Dell Committed by GitHub
Browse files

docs: `versioning` should not be combined with `matchUpdateTypes` (#17220)


Co-authored-by: default avatarRhys Arkins <rhys@arkins.net>
parent b2e763e0
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
...@@ -22,7 +22,8 @@ Configuring or overriding the default `versioning` can be particularly helpful f ...@@ -22,7 +22,8 @@ Configuring or overriding the default `versioning` can be particularly helpful f
- Although you can reconfigure versioning per-manager or per-datasource, it's unlikely that such a broad change would ever be needed - Although you can reconfigure versioning per-manager or per-datasource, it's unlikely that such a broad change would ever be needed
- More commonly you would need to configure `versioning` for individual packages or potentially package patterns - More commonly you would need to configure `versioning` for individual packages or potentially package patterns
- The best way to do this is with `packageRules`, with a combination of `matchManagers`, `matchDatasources`, `matchPackageNames` and `matchPackagePatterns` - The best way to do this is with `packageRules`, with a combination of `matchManagers`, `matchDatasources`, `matchPackageNames` and `matchPackagePatterns`.
Avoid configuring `versioning` in a rule that also uses `matchUpdateTypes`, as the update types aren't known at the time the `versioning` is applied.
## Examples of versioning overrides ## Examples of versioning overrides
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment